The embedded platform we’ve built for firmware at Oxide is called Hubris.
It’s unusual for a microcontroller operating system, and probably the biggest
thing that makes it unusual is its use of separately-compiled tasks.
Most firmware applications mash all of their task and OS code together in a
common memory space, which is simple and efficient, but can lead to subtle bugs.
Hubris instead places bits of code in their own isolated memory areas, where
they can run (and crash!) separately. This requires that each bit be compiled as
a standalone program.
The CPUs we target don’t have virtual memory, so each of these separate programs
has to be laid out at a known place in the address space. This introduces some
challenges, and has prevented us from “just” using an off-the-shelf build
system.
This post will walk through the process of building a Hubris application from
source, from the perspective of the build system, and examine some of these
challenges and how we addressed them.
I have a WASD CODE v2 tenkeyless keyboard, which has been my daily driver for
work since about 2017. It’s a great keyboard… mechanically. But its control
electronics are fixed-function and don’t quite work the way I want — to say
nothing about fancy features like additional key layers.
So I fixed it. Now it runs QMK. (Or some bare-metal custom Rust firmware.)
This has let me…
Try out QMK without the expense (or waste!) of buying a whole new keyboard.
Add features that were missing in the original, like USB n-key rollover
(NKRO), 1 kHz polling, backlight fade effects, additional key layers, and key
macros.
Customize the part of the computer I interact with the most!
(If you’re from the rest of the world and would like one, contact me! I have to
set up each country separately, and I haven’t had time to do all
two-hundred-and-some-odd.)
If it’s out of stock on either store, join the waitlist and I’ll make more.
The user manual is pretty basic, but I’ll
flesh it out further if the boards sell!
After five years of development, something like seven art projects, one
commercial product, and many changes to the dark corners of the Rust
language, I’ve decided lilos is ready for a 1.0 release!
Some parts I’m excited about include:
As of this release, the lilos APIs are entirely cancellation-safe.
This release contains contributions from five other people, bringing the total
number of contributors to seven! (Want to be number eight? Come say hi!)
Thanks to one of those contributors, the operating system tests are now
running in CI on QEMU!
(For anyone who’s new, lilos is a tiny embedded operating system that uses
Rust async to allow complex multitasking on very limited microcontrollers
without requiring dynamic memory allocation. Read more about lilos on my
project page, where I link to the docs and provide a curated collection
of blog posts on the topic.)
See the release notes if you’re curious about what’s changed. If
you’ve got firmware written for an earlier version of lilos (particularly the
0.3.x series) and would like to update (you don’t have to!), those release notes
will guide you through the process. There have been some breaking API changes,
but I promise they’re all improvements.
I’m continuing to reflect on the past four years with Hubris — April Fool’s
Day was, appropriately enough, the fourth anniversary of the first Hubris user
program, and today is the fourth anniversary of the first kernel code. (I wrote
the user program first to help me understand what the kernel’s API wanted to
look like.)
Of all of Hubris’s design decisions, there’s one that gets a “wait what”
response more often than any other. It’s also proving to be a critical part of
the system’s overall robustness. In this post, I’ll take a look at our 13th and
oddest syscall, REPLY_FAULT.
We found a neat bug in Hubris this week. Like many bugs, it wasn’t a bug when
it was originally written — correct code became a bug as other things
changed around it.
I thought the bug itself, and the process of finding and fixing it, provided an
interesting window into our development process around Hubris. It’s very rare
for us to find a bug in the Hubris kernel, mostly because it’s so small. So I
jumped at the opportunity to write this one down.
This is a tale of how two features, each useful on its own, can combine to
become a bug. Read on for details.
